US Enhances Plans to Prevent Food Terrorism03 January 2014
US - The US Food and Drug Administration has put forward a rule that would require the largest food businesses in the United States and abroad to take steps to prevent their processing plants from being the target of intentional food terrorism.
While the FDA said that it is unaware of any attempts to contaminate the food supply, it added that strategies proposed in the rule will continue to ensure the safety of the food supply.
The proposed rule is intended as a preventive measure, and the FDA seeks public comment on the proposed approach.
The proposed rule is the sixth issued under the landmark FDA FSMA law, which focuses on prevention and addresses the safety of foods that are produced domestically or are imported to the United States.
“The goal is to protect the food supply from those who may attempt to cause large-scale public health harm,” said Michael R. Taylor, the FDA’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine.
“Such events, while unlikely to occur, must be taken seriously because they have the potential to cause serious public health and economic consequences. The FDA’s goal is to devise an approach that effectively protects the food supply in a practical, cost effective manner.”
The FDA is proposing a targeted approach focused on certain processes within a food facility that are most likely to be vulnerable to attack. Under the proposed rule, a food facility would be required to have a written food defence plan that addresses significant vulnerabilities in its food production process.
Facilities then would have to identify and implement strategies to address these vulnerabilities, establish monitoring procedures and corrective actions, verify that the system is working, ensure that personnel assigned to the vulnerable areas receive appropriate training and maintain certain records.
This is the first time the FDA has proposed a regulatory approach for preventing intentional adulteration of the food supply, and the agency is seeking public input to refine our approach and further focus the scope of the rule.
Since 11 September 2001, and the subsequent passage of the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, the FDA has developed a variety of guidelines and other tools to help industry protect the food supply against intentional adulteration.
The FDA has proposed exemptions to the rule based on size of business, sales and certain types of operations such as holding and repacking food, with certain exceptions. The proposed rule does not apply to farms and food for animals.
Also in the proposed rule, the FDA describes its current thinking and is seeking comment on other issues, including economically motivated adulteration.
The FDA is seeking comments on its evaluation of what the agency considers to be low-risk activities for intentional contamination at farm mixed-type facilities, with a specific focus on the risk presented by acts of terrorism.
The FDA is proposing staggered implementation dates for the proposed rule based on business size, ranging from one year to three years after publication of the final rule. The proposed rule is available for public comment until 31 March.
TheMeatSite News Desk