Immunological Castration and Ethanol Co-products to Improve Pork Production01 August 2014
A report of research at the University of Minnesota into the effects of immunological castration and DDGS on the performance, carcass yield and meat quality of male pigs.
Global competitiveness for grains commonly fed to pigs, such as corn and soybeans, continues to grow, according to Erin Harris of the University of Minnesota and co-authors.
By utilising alternative feed ingredients such as distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and reducing the amount of resources (feed, water and land) needed to produce lean, high-quality pork, production systems can remain competitive while helping to keep pork affordable for consumers.
Historically, pork producers have surgically castrated male pigs within the first few days of life and fed barrows to market weight. Barrows eat more feed, grow slower, and are fatter than boars. Thus, barrows require more feed and utilise feed less efficiently than boars. It would be economically advantageous for pork producers to raise boars instead of barrows. However, boars naturally produce compounds, as part of their reproductive system, that cause unpleasant off-odors in the meat which consumers find unpalatable and unacceptable. Castration eliminates these off-odors.
Recently the swine research group at the University of Minnesota has been evaluating the use of a new, FDA-approved product called Improvest, at the West Central Research and Outreach Center (WCROC) in Morris, Minnesota.
Improvest works like any vaccine by using the pig's own natural immune system to produce antibodies. In the case of Improvest, the reproductive system is temporarily turned off to give the body time to remove the compounds that cause off-odours before pigs are harvested. Improvest replaces traditional surgical castration in the first few days of life, and replaces it with immunological castration which occurs later, between three and 10 weeks before harvest.
Immunologically castrated pigs remain as boars for a longer period of time, during which they consume less feed, are leaner, and grow faster than surgically-castrated pigs. Additionally, since these pigs consume less feed and are leaner, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion in manure and urine is reduced which benefits the environment.
Several countries around the world are moving away from surgical castration of pigs. In 2018, the European Union will begin a voluntary ban of surgical castration. In the US, use of Improvest by producers at this time is limited but widespread use of Improvest would reduce the amount of feed consumed and improve efficiency compared to surgically castrated pigs. The increased leanness of immunologically castrated pigs would also provide additional value to pork producers while still minimizing off-odours in pork products that are unpalatable to consumers.
At the WCROC, researchers have evaluated the growth performance, pork quality and pork fat quality of immunologically-castrated pigs fed DDGS.
DDGS is a co-product of ethanol production from corn. The fibre and fat contents of DDGS are greater than traditional ingredients fed to pigs, such as corn and soybean meal. Fat of pigs, especially immunocastrated pigs, which are leaner than barrows, reflects the fat the pig consumes. The type of fat in DDGS is high in polyunsaturated fatty acids, which makes pork fat softer. So, feeding DDGS to immunocastrated pigs could create problems with softer pork fat. This is especially evident in pork products that have a higher fat content such as bacon. Soft fat in bacon can reduce slicing yield for meat processors, decrease shelf life of the bacon, and create an overall 'greasy' appearance that is unappealing to consumers.
Research at the WCROC determined that the combination of DDGS feeding strategies and timing of Improvest did not impact growth performance of pigs. Therefore, selection of DDGS feeding strategy and timing of Improvest can be made independently.
Regardless of Improvest, pigs fed no DDGS or fed decreasing amounts of DDGS during growth had greater growth rate and improved gain efficiency than pigs fed 40 per cent DDGS.
Dressing percentage (i.e. percentage of liveweight that results in carcass weight) determines carcass value to pork producers. Results from this research study showed that pigs fed 40 per cent DDGS had reduced dressing percentage compared to pigs fed diets with no DDGS. However, dressing percentage of pigs fed decreasing amounts of DDGS, or pigs fed 40 per cent DDGS but no DDGS during the last five weeks, was not different from pigs fed no DDGS.
Regardless of the amount of DDGS in the diet, timing of the second Improvest dose did not affect growth rate but pigs receiving the second Improvest dose five weeks before harvest had improved gain efficiency, less backfat and a lower dressing percentage than pigs receiving the second dose at nine or seven weeks before harvest. While less fat is desirable to both pork producers and consumers, reduced dressing percentage decreasing the value producers receive.
Pork quality and pork fat quality are currently being evaluated.
This article was written by Erin Harris (Department of Animal Science), Lee Johnston (West Central Research and Outreach Center) and Jerry Shurson (Department of Animal Science) at the University of Minnesota and was first published in Morris Sun Tribune Farm Progress Report.